T.S.THAKUR, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Manzoor Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.
1. This petition, by way of public interest litigation, seeks direction to declare Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (“PC Act”) unconstitutional and to direct prosecution of all cases registered and investigated under the provisions of PC Act against the politicians, M.L.As, M.Ps and Government officials, without sanction as required under Section 19 of the PC Act.
2. According to the averments in the writ petition, the petitioner is a practising advocate in the State of Jammu & Kashmir. In the said State, several Government officials have been charged for corruption but in the absence of requisite sanction, they could not be prosecuted. Referring to several instances including those noticed by this Court in various orders, it is submitted that the provision for sanction as a condition precedent for prosecution is being used by the Government of India and the State Governments to protect dishonest and corrupt politicians and Government officials. The discretion to grant sanction has been misused.
3. The petition refers to various orders of this Court where incumbents were indicted but not prosecuted for want of sanction. In Common
Common Cause, a registered Society v. Union of India
Shiv Sagar Tiwari v. Union of India
M.C. Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India
Prakash Singh Badal v. State of Punjab
Lalu Prasad @ Lalu Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar Thr. CBI(AHD) Patna
K. Karunakaran v. State of Kerala
Shivajirao Nilangekar Patil v. Mahesh Madhav Gosavi (Dr.)
Vineet Narain v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.