SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 613

DIPAK MISRA, VIKRAMAJIT SEN
Punjab State Electricity Board Now Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Goel – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dipak Misra, J.


Leave granted.

2. In this appeal, by special leave, the assail is to the judgment and decree dated 25.07.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in R.S.A. No. 796 of 2012 whereby the High Court has affirmed the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below.

3. The broad essential facts which are to be stated for adjudication of this appeal are that the respondent-plaintiff joined the services of the appellant – Punjab State Electricity Board (for short ‘the Board’) on 17.12.1984 as Lower Division Clerk. As the respondent-plaintiff remained absent from duty without sanctioned leave from 9.7.1987 for a considerable time, a disciplinary proceeding was initiated against him. After following due procedure as envisaged under Punjab State Electricity Board Employees (Punishment & Appeal) Regulations, 1971, the competent authority imposed the punishment of stoppage of five annual increments without cumulative effect and further the period of absence mentioned in the Show Cause Notice was directed to be treated as non-duty period.

4. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid punishment, the respondent filed Suit No. 155 of 20



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top