SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 875

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
DURGAPUR CASUAL WORKERS UNION – Appellant
Versus
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Durgapur Casual Workers Union and others (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the workmen’ for short) against the judgment and order dated th February, 2009 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta in F.M.A. No.2345 of 2005 (C.A.N. 8685 of 2007 and C.A.N.4726 of 2008). By the impugned judgment, the High Court allowed the appeal preferred by the respondent-Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the Corporation’ for short) and set aside the Award dated 9th June, 1999 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the Tribunal’ for short) as affirmed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court at Calcutta.

3. The factual matrix of the case is as follows:

The Corporation had long back setup a rice mill in the name and style of Modern Rice Mill at Durgapur and it had been handed to successive contractors for running the same. The concerned workmen, forty nine in numbers, had been working as contract labours under the contractors in the rice mill. The last contractor was M/s Civicon. The contract system was terminated and


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top