SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1931 Supreme(SC) 40

Srijukta Saraju Bala Debi and others – Appellant
Versus
Srimati Jyotirmoyee Debi and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B. Dube, W. Wallach, A.M. Dunne

Sir Dinshah Mulla.—

This is an appeal from a decree of the High Court of Calcutta affirming the decision of the Subordinate Judge of Dacca. The question for their Lordships' consideration is whether on a true construction of three leases executed by Raja Kali Narayan Roy Chowdhury in favour of his daughter Kripamoyee Debi she took an absolute estate or an estate for life. Both the Courts in India agreed in holding that she took an absolute estate of inheritance which she could dispose of by deed or will. All the three leases are described as miras talukdari puttas and putni talukdari puttas. The words "miras talukdari putta" imply a permanent and heritable estate. The words "putni talukdari putta" import a permanent heritable estate subject to a fixed rent. The leases comprised properties forming part of the Raja's zamindari estate.

The first lease was executed on 22nd March 1865. It begins with a description of the properties and after reciting the annual income thereof proceeds as follows:

"You being my daughter, I grant you mirash taluk, by fixing Rs. 2,926 as the sadar rent thereof, for your maintenance, without selami, out of my affection for you. You and your sons born of your w


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top