ARUN MISHRA, AMITAVA ROY
Voltas Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT
AMITAVA ROY,J.
1. The oft encountered debate on the extent of tax liability based on the classification of the determinants of a levy in law seeks judicial scrutiny in the attendant factual conspectus. The appellant being aggrieved by the determination made by the High Court of Gujarat on the issue common to a reference under Section 69 of the Sales Tax Act, 1969 (for short hereinafter referred as to as the “Act”) being Sales Tax Reference No.1/2004 and its appeal, i.e. Special Civil Application No. 12508/2002, against it, seeks redress against the judgment and order dated 4.09.2006 to that effect.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. The indispensable skeletal facts introduce the appellant, M/s. Voltas Ltd. as a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged amongst others in the business of execution of jobs design, supply and installation of air-conditioning plants construed to be indivisible works contracts. It is a registered dealer under the Act. By a communication dated 22.10.1993 of M/s. Anupam Colours and Chemicals Industries,
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences v. Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandal
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I, New Delhi v. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd.
U.O.I. v. Garware Nylones Ltd.
HPL Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh
Sanden Vikas (India) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi
Income Tax Officer, Tuticorin v. T.S.Devinatha Nadar
Commissioner of Income Tax-III v. Calcutta Knitwears, Ludhiana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.