A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
DETERGENTS INDIA LTD. – Respondent
Judgment
R.F. Nariman, J.
1. These four sets of appeals relate to the correct construction of Section 4(1)(a) proviso (iii) and Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise and Salt Act as they stood prior to the 2000 amendment of Section 4. In short, these appeals deal with the definition of “related person” and the price at which valuation is to take place if sales are made to “related persons” in the course of wholesale trade.
2. It is important to note that the assessee, M/s Detergents India Limited, is the same in all the appeals, which arise out of different show cause notices for periods ranging from 1.3.1992 to September 1997. Detergents India Limited later changed its name to Henkel Marketing India Limited.
3. The facts of Civil Appeal Nos.9049-9051 of 2003 are as follows:
A show cause notice dated 8.12.1995 was issued demanding an amount of Rs.3,21,450/- for the period 20.7.1995 to 30.7.1995. The demand made under this notice was dropped vide order dated 11.3.1997 by the Deputy Commissioner, Hyderabad. An appeal against this order was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Hyderabad, by an order dated 5.1.2000. The appeal filed before CEGAT was also dismissed by the impugned judgme
Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd.
Flash Laboratories Limited v. Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi
Commissioner of Central Excise Bombay v. Universal Luggage Manufacturing Company Limited
CCE, II, Chennai v. Beacon Neyrpic Ltd.
Commissioner Central Excise, New Delhi v. India Thervit Corporation, Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.