K.SUBBA RAO, R.S.BACHAWAT, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, V.RAMASWAMI, J.R.MUDHOLKAR
Punjab Distilling Industries LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax Punjab – Respondent
Judgment
SUBBA RAO J. : This appeal by certificate raises the main question whether S. 2(6A)(d) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, hereinafter called the Act, is ultra vires the Central Legislature.
2. The assessee, a public limited company, was incorporated on May 23, 1945, under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, with a share capital of Rs. 50 lakhs. On December 15, 1947, at the instance of the appellant the High Court sanctioned the reduction of the capital of the company from Rs. 50 lakhs to Rs. 25 lakhs. On December 16, 1953, the High Court sanctioned a further reduction of the share capital from Rs. 25 lakhs to Rs. 15 lakhs. On November 4, 1954, the Registrar of Companies granted the requisite certificate under S. 61(4) of the Indian Companies Act. On November 5, 1964, the appellant issued notices to the shareholders inviting applications for the refund of share capital so reduced. On the receipt of the applications, appropriate debit entries were made in the accounts of the shareholders and the amounts were actually paid to them during the previous year, i.e., December 1, 1954 to November 30, 1955. Under S. 2(6A)(d) of the Act, "dividend" includes any distribution by a company o
Relied on : Baldev Singh v. Commr. of Income Tax, Delhi and Ajmer
Balaji v. Income Tax Officer, Special Investigation Circle Akola
Navnitlal C. Javeri v. K. K. Sen Appellate Assistant Commr. of Income Tax D Range, Bombay
Mrs. P. R. Saraiya v. Commr. of Income Tax Bombay City Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.