SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 364

V.GOPALA GOWDA, C.NAGAPPAN
Asha Verman – Appellant
Versus
Maharaj Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Rajeev Kumar Bansal and M.P. Singh, Advs.
For Respondents/Defendant: C.K. Gola, Abhishek Kumar and Viresh B. Saharya, Advs.

Judgment

V. Gopala Gowda, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals have been filed by the Appellants against the final judgment and order dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in M.A. No. 480 of 2008, wherein the High Court partly allowed the appeal of the Appellants and dismissed the review petition No. 256 of 2013 dated 21.6.2013.

3. The necessary relevant facts are stated hereunder to appreciate the case with a view to determine whether the Appellants are entitled for enhancement of compensation amount as prayed in these appeals?

4. On 27.11.2006, Jhabbu Verman, aged 35 years, was on his way back from Tripuri to Garha (Jabalpur) on his motorcycle bearing registration No. MP-20-Y-7669 and met with an accident when a truck bearing registration No. MP-20-GA-2221 being driven by Respondent No. 1 rashly and negligently collided with the back of his motorcycle. As a result of the same, Jhabbu Verman fell towards his right and the wheel of the vehicle ran over his hands which lead to severe damage to his left hand. Due to the grievous injuries caused in the sai



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top