A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-19 MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
SARKAR BUILDERS – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.K. SIKRI, J.
Leave granted.
2) No doubt the assessees/respondents in all these appeals are different and even assessment years are different. But the question of law which is raised by the Income Tax Authorities (hereinafter referred to as the 'Revenue') is identical. The assessees are subject to the jurisdiction of the different High Courts, all of whom had claimed the benefit of Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act ('Act' for short), namely, deduction in respect of profits and gains on the ground that their cases were covered by sub-section (10) of Section 80IB which provides for deduction of 100% of profits in the case of an undertaking developing and building housing projects when such profits are derived in the previous year relevant to any assessment year from such housing projects, provided the conditions contained in the said sub-section are satisfied. High Courts have taken the same view holding that these assessees would be entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Act. We may also point out at this stage itself that though Section 80IB has been on the statute book for quite some time, a new Section 80IB had been introduced by the Finance Act, 1999
Commissioner of Income Tax I, Ahmedabad v. Gold Coin Health Food Private Limited
The Karimtharuvi Tea Estate Ltd. v. The State of Kerala
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Shah Sadiq and Sons
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I, New Delhi v. Vatika Township Private Limited
M/s. Reliance Jute and Industries Ltd. v. C.I.T., West Bengal, Calcutta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.