A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
JOSHI TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL INC. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Judgment
A.K. Sikri, J.
Present appeal impugnes the judgment and order dated 28.05.2012 passed by the High Court of Delhi, thereby dismissing the writ petition which was filed by the appellant. It so happened that the appellant had entered into two contracts dated 20.02.1995 with the Union of India, through Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoPNG) in the year 1992 relating to exploration of certain oil fields which the Union of India had selected in Gujarat and other States. These contracts were on production sharing basis for Dholka and Wavel Oil Fields respectively. It started the production after entering into the contract and filed its income tax return on the income generated from the aforesaid production. In the returns, the appellant claimed benefit of Section 42 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). Section 42 is a special provision for deductions in the case of business for prospecting, etc. for mineral oil. It provides for certain additional allowances as are specified in the agreement, details thereof would be taken note of hereinafter. We may, however, point out here itself that such allowances, as stipulated in the Section, are to be sp
K.N. Guruswamy v. State of Mysore
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U.P.
ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corpn.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun v. Enron Oil and Gas India Limited
CIT v. Enron Expat Service Inc.
Andi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas Swami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust v. R. Rudani
Bareilly Development Authority v. Ajai Pal Singh
Divisional Forest Officer v. Bishwanath Tea Co. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.