J.CHELAMESWAR, R.K.AGRAWAL
Bharti Airtel Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Judgment
Chelameswar, J.
1. These five civil appeals under Section 18 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the “TRAI Act”) and three writ petitions raise common questions. Each of the appellants or the petitioners, as the case may be, in these matters (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘LICENSEES’) is a licensee holding a licence granted under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 for providing TELEGRAPH services in the various earmarked service areas.
2. It appears from the judgment of this Court in Centre for Public Interest Litigation & Others v. Union of India & Others, (2012) 3 SCC 1, hereinafter referred to as 2G case, that the first telegraph link in India was experimented in 1839 between Calcutta and Diamond Harbor separated by a distance of 21 miles. By an act of the British Parliament, known as the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, the privilege of “establishing, maintaining and working of telegraphs” within the territory of British India was exclusively conferred under Section 4 upon the Central Government – an expre
Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India
Natural Resources Allocation, In Re. Special Reference No.1 of 2012
Union of India v. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India
State of Punjab v. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd.
Har Shankar v. The Dy. Excise and Taxation Commissioner
Panna Lal v. State of Rajasthan
Hotel Sea Gull v. State of West Bengal
Kerala State Electricity Board v. M/s. S.N. Govinda Prabhu and Bros.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.