R.V.RAVEENDRAN, A.K.PATNAIK
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A. K. Patnaik, J.
Civil Appeal Nos. 5059 of 2007, 179-180 of 2008, 311-314, 317-318 of 2008, 363 of 2008, 2065 of 2008, 1229-1230 of 2008 and 3868 of 2009:
These are appeals under Section 18 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (for short “the TRAI Act”) against the common judgment and order dated 30.08.2007 of the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short “the Tribunal”) in Petition No. 7 of 2003.
2. The relevant facts very briefly are that with the introduction of the National Telecom Policy, 1994 liberalizing the Telecom Sector, telecom licenses were issued to different service providers. The licenses granted to the service providers stipulated a fixed license fee, which was payable by the service providers every year. During the period 1994 to 1999, the licensees defaulted in payment of license fee and made a representation to the Government of India, Ministry of Telecommunications for relief against the high license fee for the survival of the telecom industry. The Government of India considered the representations and after a number of deliberations with the licensees offered a new package, known as the “National Tele
State of Orissa and Others v. Harinarayan Jaiswal and Others [(1972) 2 SCC 36]
Shyam Telelink Limited vs. Union of India [(2010) 10 SCC 165]
Delhi Science Forum and Others v. Union of India [(1996) 2 SCC 405]
State of Manipur v. Thingujam Brojen Meetei [(1996) 9 SCC 29]. Referred. (Para 23)
State of Orissa & Ors. vs. Narain Prasad & Ors.[(1996) 5 SCC 740]
Kamla Bakshi v. Khairati Lal [(2000) 3 SCC 681]
State of U.P. v. Devi Dayal Singh [(2000) 3 SCC 5]
Kunhay Ahmed & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Anr. [(2000) 6 SCC 359]
Cellular Operators Association of India & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. [(2003) 3 SCC 186
State of M.P. & Ors. vs. KCT Drinks Ltd. [(2003) 4 SCC 748]
Har Shankar & Ors. vs. The Deputy Excise & Taxation Commissioner & others [(1975) 1 SCC 737]
Panna Lal v. State of Rajasthan [(1975) 2 SCC 633]
Chief Justice of A.P. vs. L.V.A. Dixitulu [(1979) 2 SCC 34
Government of A.P. vs. M/s Anabeshahi Wine & Distilleries Pvt. Ltd [(1988) 2 SCC 25]
Isabella Johnson vs. M.A. Susai (Dead) by LRs. [(1991) 1 SCC 494]
Assistant Excise Commissioner & Anr. vs. Issac Peter & Ors. [(1994) 4 SCC 104]
K. Vidya Sagar v. State of U.P. and Others [(2005) 5 SCC 581]
National Institute of Technology vs. Niraj Kumar Singh [(2007) 2 SCC 481
P.V. George v. State of Kerala [(2007) 3 SCC 557]
Union of India v. Tata Teleservices (Mahrashtra) Ltd. [2007) 7 SCC 517]
Chandrabhai K. Bhoir and Others vs. Krishna Arjun Bhoir and Others [(2009) 2 SCC 315]
Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Collector of Central Excise, Baroda [(2007) 13 SCC 803]
Bharti Cellular Limited vs. Union of India & Ors. [(2010) 10 SCC 174]
Medley Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs [(2011) 2 SCC 601]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.