SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 478

A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Commnr. of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Stangen Immuno Diagnostics – Respondent


Judgment

Arjan Kumar Sikri, J.

1. The Respondent herein is the manufacturers of composite diagnostics or laboratory regents and pharmaceutical goods. It is registered as a small scale industrial unit (SSI unit). The Respondent was using the brand name 'Stangen' on the goods manufactured by it. It is an admitted case that this brand name 'Stangen' was affixed on the packing of the goods and even on the goods manufactured. The Respondent started availing the benefit of exemption/concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 175/86-CE dated 1.3.1986 which grants exemption or concessional rate of excise duty to the SSI units.

2. However, in the year 1997 a show cause notice was issued to the Respondent by the Appellant/Excise Department stating that the Respondent is wrongly claiming the benefit of the aforesaid Notification inasmuch as use of the brand name 'Stangen' and also the logo belonged to Dr. K. Anji Reddy, Chairman of Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (DRL). It was stated that DRL is the manufacturer of bulk drugs falling under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and the trade mark 'Stangen' and related logo are used on the printed labels foils of the P & P medicine man




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top