SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 633

T.S.THAKUR, R.BANUMATHI
Kiriti Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R. Banumathi, J.

1. These appeals by way of special leave arise out of the judgment dated 20.6.2012 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in Death Reference No. 3/2011 and Criminal Appeals No. 471/2011 and 484/2011 confirming the conviction Under Section 302/120B Indian Penal Code and modifying the death sentence as that of life imprisonment and further confirming the conviction and sentence imposed on the Appellants-accused Under Section 25(i)(a)(b)of the Arms Act. Briefly stated, case of the prosecution is that deceased Anjali Goswami was married to one Karuna Sindhu Goswami. Her husband used to run a line hotel at Mohd. Bazar and he died in a road accident in the year 2000. Her daughter committed suicide in the year 2006 and son also died in a road accident in the year 2008. Anjali started looking after the business of line hotel of her husband but subsequently leased out the same to PW14-Bhagyadhar Dhibar and started a beauty parlour and a cloth shop at Mohd. Bazar which she subsequently shifted to Suri in a rented accommodation of PW10-Manash Chakraborty. Fourth Appellant-accused Durga Sutradhar was engaged by Anjali to run her beauty parlour. Anjali purchased a house at







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top