SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 563

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, N.V.RAMANA
Charanjit Pal Jindal – Appellant
Versus
L. N. Metalics – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Leave granted. This appeal has been preferred by the accused-Appellant against the judgment and order dated 9th November, 2012 passed by the High Court of Orissa, Cuttack in Crl. Revision No. 467 of 2011. By the impugned judgment and order the said Criminal Revision has been dismissed by the High Court affirming the concurrent finding of conviction arrived at by the Trial Court and the Appellate Court.

2. The facts leading to the present appeal is as follows:

The Respondent-company filed a complaint case stating therein that it dealt with production, manufacturing, marketing and selling of sponge iron and other allied iron ore products. The Appellant who was one of its customers, placed orders through its agent M/s. Jayani Ispat, Raipur during 21.06.2007 and 24.12.2007 under different invoices and challans. Accordingly, various materials were supplied to the Appellant by the Respondent-Company. The Appellant also made payment in intervals. However, by 24.12.2007 an amount of Rs.72,22,037/- remained outstanding on the Appellant. As such, a request was made to clear the outstanding amount. On such request, in the month of December, 2007, a sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- was paid. On























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top