DIPAK MISRA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
Bablu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, J.
The pivotal issues, quite disturbing and disquieting, that emanate in this appeal by special leave for scrutiny, deliberation and apposite delineation, fundamentally pertain to the role of the prosecution and the duty of the court within the requisite paradigm of fair trial which in the ultimate conceptual eventuality results in appropriate stability of criminal justice dispensation system. The attitude of callousness and non-chalance portrayed by the prosecution and the total indifferent disposition exhibited by the learned trial Judge in shutting out the evidence and closing the trial after examining a singular formal witness, PW 1, in a trial where the accused persons were facing accusations for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which entailed an acquittal under Section 232 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC), are really disconcerting; and indubitably cause discomfort to the judicial conscience. It seems that everyone concerned with the trial has treated it as a farce where the principal protagonists compete with each other for gaining supremacy in the race of closing the case u
Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh v. State of Gujarat
Abinash Chandra Bose v. Bimal Krishna Sen
K.Chinnaswamy Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Ayodhya Dube v. Ram Sumer Singh
Sunil Kumar Pal v. Phota Sheikh
Satyajit Banerjee v. State of W.B.
Mary Pappa Jebamani v. Ganesan
Bindeshwari Prasad Singh alias B.P. Singh v. State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)
Manu Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)
J. Jayalalithaa v. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.