SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1187

H.L.DATTU, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Tahera Khotoon – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer/Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent


ORDER :

Leave granted

1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature of A.P. at Hyderabad in AS Nos. 1799 of 2000 and 1155 of 2001, dated 8.10.2009. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has quantified the compensation payable to the land owners in a sum of Rs. 400 Sq. yards with other statutory benefits. The facts in nutshell are: The Municipal Committee, Warangal had taken possession of a land situate in old Waddepalli Village to an extent of 3733 Sq. yards in Survey No. 37 on 1.1.1938. The Municipal Committee had developed the said land into a park which was known as "Nehru Park". To avoid further dispute, the Municipal Committee had requested the State Government to acquire the aforesaid land by initiating land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act').

2. Pursuant to the request so made by the Municipal Committee, a preliminary Notification was issued by the State Government, dated 14.1.1996. After considering the objections filed by the land owners under Section 5-A of the Act, the State Government had issued final Notification under Section 6(1) of the Act.

3. After













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top