SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 1027

B.S.CHAUHAN, J.CHELAMESWAR
Phool Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant : Ajit Kumar Pande, Adv.

ORDER :

1. This petition has been filed against the order dated 14.5.2013 passed by High Court of Judicature at Allahabad while dealing with the application for early hearing in Criminal Appeal No. 4309 of 2012.

2. The Petitioners stood convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 363/366/506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Indian Penal Code') in Sessions Trial No. 879 of 2010 (State of U.P. v. Phool Chandra and Anr.) arising out of Case Crime No. 28 of 2009, Police Station Utraon, District Allahabad in which FIR was lodged on 8.2.2009 by one Bhola Nath alleging that his daughter Kumari Manita aged 14 years, student of class 10th had gone to school on 6.2.2009 but did not return. He also expressed suspicion that his neighbour Sharda Prasad Gupta might be involved in the incident. In pursuance of the aforesaid complaint, investigation ensued and the victim Manita was recovered by the police on 12.2.2009. After completing the investigation, the chargesheet was filed against the Petitioners and some other persons under the aforesaid Sections of the Indian Penal Code and after conclusion of the trial, vide judgment and order dated 8.10.2012, the Petit


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top