SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1212

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.L. Dattu and C. Nagappan, JJ.
GUI-ATI and Company – Appellant
Vs.
Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P., Lucknow – Respondent
C.A. Nos. 1779-1782 of 2004
Decided On : 12.12.2013

Headnote:

U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Section 3-A – Payment of Taxes – Aggrieved by the order of assessment – Recorded Evidence - Other expression used in entry is whether foodstuff is used as such or after mixing with any other foodstuff or beverage - That only means to say that Entry contemplates that when foodstuff is used as such or it is mixed with any other foodstuff or beverage and thereafter sold in sealed or tinned containers notification certainly would apply and rate of tax on such foodstuff would be at relevant point of time In exercise of the powers under Clause (b) of Sub-section (1) of Section 3-A of U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 with Section 21 of U.P. General Clauses Act 1904 Governor is pleased to make, with effect from following amendment in Notification as amended from time to time – Held, In common parlance words food and foodstuff are used interchangeably - Any reference to food in common parlance suggests a substance or composite preparation which constitutes a meal to satiate hunger - Two products are either chemically manufactured or processed after their isolation from a plant and therefore available as retail products in their concentrated forms - Thus food colors and essences cannot be consumed as such and their addition to any foodstuff is basically to ornamentally improve end-product by making it attractive and impressive - Purpose behind their addition is to aid appetite by pleasing ones olfactory and ocular senses - Insofar as food essence is concerned it also aids in improvement of taste of food product - They have no relation to enhancing nutritive value of food and only cosmetically aid in enhancing aesthetic value of food product - In light of aforesaid it could be concluded that food colors and food essences have not been considered to be foodstuff or a combination of foodstuffs by either lexicographers or in common parlance and two by no stretch of imagination would constitute foodstuff - Therefore we are of considered opinion that claim of assessed that food colors and food essences are foodstuffs within meaning of notification was rightly rejected by high court upsetting view expressed by tribunal words dyes and colors used in Entry 10 and the words scents and perfumes used in Entry 37 have to be construed in their own context and in sense, as ordinarily understood and attributed to these words by people usually conversant with and dealing in such goods. Similarly the words food coolers and "syrup essences which are descriptive of class of goods the sales of which are to be taxed under Act have to be construed in sense in which they are popularly understood by those who deal in them and who purchase and use them Having gone though orders passed by he High Court are of considered view that High Court has not committed any error whatsoever which would call for our interference in these appeals – Accordingly appeals stands dismissed - No costs - Appeal dismissed

JUDGMENT :

1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Sales Tax Revision Nos. 974 of 1991, 1011 of 1990, 975 of 1991 and 1013 of 1990, dated 21.08.2003, whereby and whereunder, the High Court has allowed the revision petitions of the Revenue and set aside the order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The issue that falls for our consideration and decision in these Civil Appeals is 'whether food colours and food essences used in the manufacturing of foodstuffs and food products would fall under Entry 56 of the Notification No.ST-2-7218/10/6(43)/77, dated 30.09.1977' (for short "the notification").

2. In order to answer the aforesaid issue, brief facts may be noted. For the sake of convenience, we would only notice facts in Civil Appeal No. 1179 of 2004. In this appeal, we are concerned with the assessment years 1979-80, 1981-82, 1982-83 and 1983-84. The Appellant is a dealer under the Act. It is engaged in the sale of various items, including food colors and food essences and according to the Appellant, the aforesaid products are used in the manufacture of foodstuffs and food products.

3. At the stage, it would be useful to refer to the said notification issued by the State Government. The same is extracted under:

Notification No. ST-II-7218/X-6(43)-77-U.P. Act XV/48-Order-77, dated 30.9.1977

[Published in U.P. Gazette Extraordinary, dated 1-10-1977]

In exercise of the powers under Clause (b) of Sub-section (1) of Section 3-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (U.P. Act No. XV of 1948), read with Section 21 of the U.P. General Clauses Act, 1904 (U.P. Act No. 1 of 1904), the Governor is pleased to make, with effect from October 1, 1977, the following amendment in Notification No. ST-II-332/X-1012-1971, dated November 15, 1971, as amended from time to time:

AMENDMENT

In the Schedule to the aforesaid notification, for the existing entries under Columns II, III and IV, against Items 9, 23, 29, 32, 33, 37, 39, 46, 56, 61, 71 and 95, the following entries shall be substituted, namely:

xxx

56. Milk powder, condensed milk, baby milk, baby food and all other foodstuffs or products, whether used as such or after mixing them with any other foodstuff or beverage, when sold in sealed or tinned containers.

4. The rate of tax stood at 5% at the relevant time. The aforesaid entry was reiterated in a subsequent notification No. 5785, dated 07.09.1981 and the rate of tax was enhanced from 5% to 6%.

5. Before we advert to the findings of the assessing authority, the Tribunal and the High Court, we would analyse Entry 56 of the Notification. The said entry speaks of milk powder, condensed milk, baby milk, baby food and all other foodstuffs or products. The legislature by using the expression "all other" would intend to include any article which is edible in nature. The other expression used in the entry is "whether the foodstuff is used as such or after mixing with any other foodstuff or beverage". That only means to say that Entry 56 contemplates that when the foodstuff is used as such or it is mixed with any other foodstuff or beverage and thereafter, sold in sealed or tinned containers, the Notification certainly would apply and the rate of tax on such foodstuff would be at 5% or 6%, as at the relevant point of time.

6. The Sales Tax Authority was of the view that sale of food colours and essences by the Appellant Assessee would not fall within Entry 56 of the Notification and therefore, computed the sales tax liability of the Appellant and passed the order of assessment.

7. Aggrieved by the order of assessment, the Assessee had unsuccessfully filed the First Appeal and thereafter filed second appeal before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, inter alia, questioning the assessment orders passed by the assessing authority for the assessment years 1979-80, 1981-82, 1982-83 and 1983-84. The Tribunal, by its orders dated 17.2.1990 and 22.4.1991 has allowed the appeals by accepting






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top