SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(SC) 48

FAZAL ALI, VIVIAN BOSE
State Of Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Virkumar Gulabchand Shah – Respondent


Advocates:
B.K.V.NAIDU, B.SOMALAYA, C.K.DAFTARY, G.N.Joshi, M.S.K.Shastri, P.A.Mehta

Judgment

FAZL ALI J.- I agree that the acquittal of the respondent should not be disturbed, and I also agree generally with the reasoning of my brother, Bose. The question whether turmeric is foodstuff is not entirely free from difficulty. In one sense, everything which enters into the composition of food so as to make it palatable may be described as foodstuff , but that word is commonly used with reference only to those articles which are eaten of their nutritive value and which form the principal ingredients of cooked or uncooked meal, such as wheat, rice, meat, fish, milk ,bread, butter, etc. It seems to me desirable that the Act should be amended so as to expressly include within the definition of the somewhat elastic expression foodstuff , turmeric as such other condiments as the Legislature intends to be treated as such for achieving the object in its view.

2. BOSE J.- The question in this case is whether turmeric is a "foodstuff" within the meaning of clause 3 of the Spices (Forward Contracts Prohibition) Order, 1944, read with section 2 (a) of the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 (Act XXIV of 1946).

3. The respondent was charged with having contravened clau





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top