SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Patna - Appellant
Vs.
New Swadeshi Sugar Mills - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 2043 of 2006
Decided On : 19-08-2015
Tariff Act - Rule, 2002 - Service Tax –– Customs, Excise and Service Tax - It has been illegally or irregularly taken – Jurisdiction - Assessed had applied for grant of single licence for both units as distilling unit was using molasses manufactured by sugar unit as inputsfor manufacture of dutiable and non-dutiable products denatured spirit and rectified spirit respectively and also because of reason both these units were located in same premises – Held, It is clear from these Rules, as court read them that a manufacturer obtains credit for excise duty paid on raw material to be used by him in production of an excisable product immediately it makes requisite declaration and obtains an acknowledgment thereof - It is entitled to use the credit at any time thereafter when making payment of excise duty on excisable product. There is no provision in Rules which provides for a reversal of credit by excise authorities except where it has been illegally or irregularly taken, in which event it stands canceled or if utilized, has to be paid for - Court are here really concerned with credit that has been validly taken and its benefit is available to manufacturer without any limitation in time or otherwise unless manufacturer itself chooses not to use raw material in its excisable product credit is, therefore, indefeasible - It should also be noted that there is no co-relation of raw material and final product that is to say it is not as if credit can be taken only on a final product that is manufactured out of particular raw material to which credit is related - Credit may be taken against excise duty on a final product manufactured on very day that it becomes available - It is therefore that in case of Either Motors Ltd. v. Union of India this Court said that a credit under MODVAT scheme was as good as tax paid - Going by spirit of aforesaid observations court have no doubt in our mind that view of Tribunal is perfectly justified and does not call for any interference Rule 6 which has been relied upon by Revenue only speaks of non-availability of MODVAT credit to a manufacturer after enforcement of these rules when he is engaged in manufacture of exempted goods also falling under heading Tariff Act - From perusal of this Rule, it is evident that under the new CENVAT Credit Rule, 2002, no credit shall be allowed to the manufacturer on such quantity of inputs which is used in manufacturer of exempted goods and those exempted goods have been detailed in Clause 3(a) of this rule - This rule nowhere takes away the right of a manufacturer to utilize already accumulated credit under earlier CENVAT Credit Rules - Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Sikri, J.
1. The Respondent (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessee") had two units, one is for the manufacture of sugar and molasses and the other for distilling of denatured spirit, which is dutiable product and rectified spirit, which is non-dutiable product. The Assessee had applied for grant of single licence for both the units as the distilling unit was using molasses manufactured by sugar unit, as inputs, for the manufacture of dutiable and non-dutiable products i.e. denatured spirit and rectified spirit respectively and also because of the reason both these units were located in the same premises. This request of the Assessee was allowed and the Assessee was granted the single licence.
2. In the present case, we are concerned with the CENVAT Credit which was earned by the Assessee in terms of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001 which were in existence. These Rules were superseded by new Rules, namely, CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the "Rules, 2002").
3. It would be relevant to point out here that under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, the Assessee was also paying duty @ 8% of the value of the exempted goods cleared by it in lieu of the CENVAT Credit availed by it on the inputs utilized in the manufacture of its goods. The duty was obviously paid on the dutiable products, namely, denatured spirit. The issue pertains to the utilization of the CENVAT Credit which was already accumulated in favour of the Assessee at the time when the Rules, 2002 were brought into force. The utilization of the major portion of the credit was denied to the Assessee by the Adjudicating Authority invoking the provisions of Rule 6 of the Rules, 2002. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal"), however, reversed the aforesaid decision of the Commissioner holding that Rule 6 has to be given effect to prospectively and it would not come in the way of the CENVAT Credit already earned and accumulated by the Assessee. Since interpretation of Rule 9 read with Rule 6 as well as Rule 3(3) of the Rules, 2002, is involved, we re-produce the relevant Rules 3(3), 6 and 9 as under:
Rule 3. CENVAT credit.-
(1) xxx
(2) xxx
(3) The CENVAT credit may be utilized for payment of-
(a) any duty of excise on any final product; or
(b) an amount equal to CENVAT credit taken on inputs if such inputs are removed as such or after being partially processed; or
(c) an amount equal to the CENVAT credit taken on capital goods if such capital goods are removed as such; or
(d) an amount Under Sub-rule (2) of Rule 16 of Centrall Excise Rules, 2002.
Provided that while paying duty, the CENVAT credit shall be utilized only to the extent such credit is available on the last day of the month for payment of duty relating to the month.
Provided further that the CENVAT credit of the duty paid on the inputs used in the manufacture of final products cleared after availing of the exemption under the notification numbers 32/99-Central Excise, dated the 8th July, 1999 [G.S.R. 508 (E) dated the 8th July, 1999] and 33/99-Central Excise, dated the 8th July, 1999 [G.S.R. 509 (E) dated the 8th July, 1999], shall be utilized only for payment of duty on final products, cleared after availing of the exemption under the said notification numbers 32/99-Central Excise, dated the 8th July, 1999 and 32/99-Central Excise, dated the 8th July, 1999.]
Provided also that the CENVAT credit of the duty paid on the inputs used in the manufacture of final products cleared after availing of the exemption under the notifications No. 39/2001-Central Excise, dated the 31st July, 2001 [G.S.R. 565 (E), dated the 31st July, 2001], No. 56/2002-Central Excise dated the 14th November, 2002, [G.S.R. 764 (E) dated the 14th November, 2002], No. 57/2002-Central Excise, dated the 14th November, 2002 [G.S.R. 765 (E), dated the 14th November, 2002] and No. 56/2003-Central Excise, dated the 25th June, 2003 [G.S.R. 513(E), dated the 25th June, 2003] shall respe
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.