DIPAK MISRA, N.V.RAMANA
V. L. S. Finance Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
S. P. Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dipak Misra, J.
Leave granted.
2. The obtaining factual matrix encompasses a scenario which covers quite a span of time, and the chronology of events projects horrendous picture, as Mr. Dushyant A. Dave and Ms. Indu Malhotra, learned senior counsel would submit with stirred vehemence and expressive concern on the formulation that exploitation of legal system, seemingly looking innocent, has, in fact, cultivated the path of deviation that has led to pathetic miscarriage of justice, for there has been real abuse of the process of law at every stage. Learned counsel for the appellants put the blame on the respondents, as they have visited the superior courts on many an occasion seeking intervention possibly harbouring the idea that it is a routine exercise. In such an exploration, they have not felt any desperation despite being unsuccessful, for the desire was not mitigation of the grievance but consumption of time which, by itself, is beneficial because the consequences of the litigation has been deferred. However, the last visit to the High Court has yielded some benefit which has pained the appellants to severely criticize the order impugned on many a ground apart from the
Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal
Patel Narshi Thakershi v. Pradyuman Singh Ji Arjun Singh Ji
Subhash Chander v. State (Chandigarh Administration)
Sheonandan Paswan v. State of Bihar
Balwant Singh v. State of Bihar
Subhash Chander v. State (Chandigarh Admn.)
State of Bihar v. Ram Naresh Pandey
V.S. Achuthanandan v. R. Balakrishna Pillai
Bairam Muralidhar v. State of A.P.
Vijaykumar Baldev Mishra alias Sharma v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.