SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Ker) 176

J.S.VERMA, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, S.P.BHARUCHA
Achuthanandan – Appellant
Versus
V. R. Balakrishna Pillai – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The challenge in this appeal by special leave is to the legality of the order dated 3rd February, 1993 passed by Chettur Sankaran Nair, J. of the Kerala High Court allowing Criminal Revision No.762 of 1992 filed by the State of Kerala and setting aside the order dated 16th October, 1992 passed by the Special Judge, Idamalayar, in Crl.M.P.No.79 of 1992 in C.C.1 of 1991 declining to give consent to the Public Prosecutor to withdraw the prosecution against the sixth accused - G. Gopalakrishna Pillai, former Secretary, Irrigation and Power to the Government of Kerala.

2. The material facts may now be briefly stated. Idamalayar Dam as a part of the Idamalayar Project was sanctioned by the Planning Commission and huge expenditure in its construction was incurred upto March, 1985. However, in the trial run itself on 15-7-1985 a number of leaks were discovered in the tunnel exposing the inferior quality of construction work which was a matter of grave public concern giving rise to ventilation of that concern through the press and even in the State Legislative Assembly. There was public outcry of a judicial probe into the matter. Extensive repair at considerable cost had to be
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top