Based on the provided legal document, the property does not remain a coparcenary after certain events, particularly the death of a male coparcener. When a male owner dies intestate, the property devolves among his heirs according to the rules of succession, and the joint family property is deemed to be partitioned by operation of law. This results in the property being held as tenants in common by the heirs, rather than as a unified coparcenary entity (!) (!) .

Furthermore, if the interest of a deceased coparcener devolves through intestate succession, the property ceases to be a coparcenary in the hands of the successors. It is then divided into separate shares, and the heirs hold their respective portions as individual tenants in common, thereby losing the joint status of the coparcenary property (!) (!) (!) .

In cases where the property was originally joint and a partition was made prior to the death, the joint status may be preserved up to that point. However, after the death of a coparcener and the application of succession laws, the property is generally no longer considered a coparcenary in the hands of the successors, as they hold the property as tenants in common (!) (!) (!) .

Therefore, property does not remain a coparcenary after the death of a male coparcener and the subsequent devolution of his interest among heirs, especially when the property is divided by operation of law or through succession. It transitions from a joint coparcenary to individual holdings as tenants in common.