V.GOPALA GOWDA
SATYA PAL ANAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V. Gopala Gowda, J. — I have gone through the judgment of my learned brother Judge, Justice Dipak Misra, wherein certain relevant facts have been adverted to by my learned brother on the contentious legal issues urged on behalf of the parties. My learned brother has also adverted to the relevant provisions under Sections 20, 21, 22 and 32 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908.
2. My learned brother Judge has also referred to the full bench decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Yanala Malleshwari v. Anantula Sayamma AIR 2007 AP 57, the judgment of the Madras High Court in the case of E.R. Kalaivan v. Inspector General of Registration, Chennai & Anr. AIR 2010 Madras 18 and the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the case of M. Ramakrishna Reddy v. Sub Registrar, Bangalore & Anr. AIR 2000 Karnataka 46 My learned brother judge has also referred the decision of this Court in the case of Thota Ganga Laxmi & Anr. v. Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. (2010) 15 SCC 207, wherein the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the Writ Petition of the appellant therein, relying on the Full Bench decision of Yanala Malleshwari (supra).
3. I have also taken into
Yanala Malleshwari v. Anantula Sayamma AIR 2007 AP 57.
Thota Ganga Laxmi & Anr. v. Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. (2010) 15 SCC 207.
Government of U.P. v. Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan AIR 1961 SC 787.
Pratap Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1964 SC 72.
Arunachalam v. P.S.R. Sadhanantham and Anr. (1979) 2 SCC 297.
Ganga Kumar Shrivastav v. State of Bihar (2005) 6 SCC 211.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.