SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 263

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V. Gopala Gowda, Arun Mishra, JJ.
Savelife Foundation & Anr. – Petitioners
Vs.
Union of India & Anr. – Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 235 of 2012
Decided On : 30-03-2016

IMPORTANT POINTS
‘Good Samaritan Guidelines’ issued vide notification dated 12.5.2015 by Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India approved with certain modifications.
Acknowledgement mentioning the name of Samaritan, address, time, date, place of occurrence and confirming that the injured person was brought by the said Samaritan; to be issued on demand.
Affidavit of Good Samaritan, if filed, shall be treated as complete statement by the Police official while conducting the investigation. Statement if to be recorded, complete statement shall be recorded in a single examination.
Appearance of Good Samaritans not to be insisted by courts. Commission may be appointed u/s 284, CrPC, if required.
Guidelines would be without prejudice to liability of driver of a motor vehicle involved in a road accident u/s 134, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Headnote:(a) Road accidents – Help to crash victims – Need to enact a Good Samaritan Law for affording protection to Good Samaritans stressed – ‘Good Samaritan Guidelines’ issued vide notification dated 12.5.2015 by Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India – Directed to be in force till framing of appropriate legislation by Union Legislature. (Para 7, 10, 11)

       (b) Constitution of India – Article 32 r/w Article 142 – Filling the void in absence of suitable legislation – Now a well-settled practice – Guidelines dated 12.5.2015 – Necessary for protection of rights under Article 21 read with Article 14 of the Constitution of India so as to provide immediate help to the victims of the accident and to provide protection to Good Samaritans – Held, the guidelines will have force of law under Article 141 – All authorities, judicial and civil, duty bound to implement the guidelines – Article 144, Constitution of India. (Para 17, 18)

       (1984) 2 SCC 244; (1997) 1 SCC 416; (1997) 6 SCC 241; (1998) 1 SCC 226; (2002) 5 SCC 294; (2005) 3 SCC 284; (2015) 7 SCC 1 – Relied upon

       (c) Road accidents – Protection to good Samaritans – Acknowledgement – Mentioning the name of Samaritan, address, time, date, place of occurrence and confirming that the injured person was brought by the said Samaritan – To be issued on demand. (Para 19)

       (d) Road accidents – Examination of good Samaritans by Police – Affidavit of Good Samaritan, if filed, shall be treated as complete statement by the Police official while conducting the investigation – Statement if to be recorded, complete statement shall be recorded in a single examination. (Para 19)

       (e) Road accidents – Protection to Good Samaritans – Appearance of Good Samaritans not to be insisted by courts – Commission may be appointed u/s 284, CrPC. (Para 20)

       (f) Road accidents – Protection to Good Samaritans – Guidelines in relation to protection of a Good Samaritan – Without prejudice to liability of driver of a motor vehicle involved in a road accident – Section 134, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. (Para 21)

       Facts of the case:

       The petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India in public interest for the development of supportive legal framework to protect Samaritans i.e. bystanders and passers by who render the help to the victims of road accidents.

       in low income countries, the most common desisting factor restraining the public from coming forward to help victims, is the apparent fear of being involved in police cases. There is need to build confidence amongst the public to help road accident victims. Bystanders should not be insisted to divulge their personal particulars or detained in the hospital for interrogation.

       Finding of the Court:

       ‘Good Samaritan Guidelines’ issued vide notification dated 12.5.2015 by Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India approved with certain modifications.

       Result : Writ petition stands allowed

JUDGMENT :

Arun Mishra, J.

1. The petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India in public interest for the development of supportive legal framework to protect Samaritans i.e. bystanders and passers by who render the help to the victims of road accidents. These individuals can play a significant role in order to save lives of the victims by either immediately rushing them to the hospital or providing immediate life saving first aid.

2. The petitioner is ‘Save Life Foundation’, a non-profit, non-governmental organization registered as a Public Charitable Trust and had been established in 2008. The petitioner aims to create a unique network of medical responders to come to the victim’s aid. The petitioner has also drafted recommendations to address the critical deficiencies in the Motor Vehicles Act, and other laws governing road safety.

3. The Department of Road Transport is responsible for framing motor vehicle legislation and evolving road safety standards in India. The WHO in its ‘World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention, 2004’ has projected that by 2020, road accidents will be one of the biggest killers in India. It also emphasized that in low income countries, the most common desisting factor restraining the public from coming forward to help victims, is the apparent fear of being involved in police cases. There is need to build confidence amongst the public to help road accident victims. Bystanders should not be insisted to divulge their personal particulars or detained in the hospital for interrogation. People are hesitant to render immediate help to the road accident victims. The victims lay wounded on the road for some time till the arrival of police. Delay rendering medical help in such cases sometimes is fatal. Good Samaritans have the fear of legal consequences, involvement in litigation and repeated visits to police station. There is urgent need to tackle these issues. There is need to establish legal framework so that Good Samaritan is empowered to act without any fear of adverse consequences or harassment. Save life must be the top priority.

4. Several countries have enacted such laws. In England and Wales, the Parliament has enacted the Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Act 2015 which provides for certain factors to be considered by the Court while hearing an action for negligence or breach of duty. Section 2 of the Act provides that the Court must consider whether the respondent was acting for the benefit of society or any of its members. Section 5 of the Act further provides that the Court must consider whether the respondent was acting heroically by intervening in an emergency to assist an individual in danger. In Ireland, section 51D of the Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2011 provides that a good Samaritan will not be liable in negligence for any act done in emergency to help person in serious and imminent danger. In Australia, protection to good Samaritan is provided in several states. In New South Wales and Victoria, for instance, a good Samaritan is protected from personal civil liability with respect to anything done in state of emergency or accident by virtue of Civil Liability Act 2002 and Wrongs Act 1958 respectively. In Canada, various states like Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia offer protection to good Samaritans. In Ontario, the Good Samaritan Act 2001, by Section 2(1), provides that except for gross negligence, a person is not liable for damages resulting from his acts during aid in emergency. Similar protection is provided in states of Alberta, British Columbia and Nova Scotia by Emergency Medical Aid Act, Good Samaritan Act and Volunteer Services Act respectively. Similar protection to good Samaritans is to be found in different states’ laws in the USA. States of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California and New York, to name a few, provide that if a person lends emergency assistance or service to another person in good faith, he is not liabl






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top