SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 619

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, R. BANUMATHI, JJ.
PEPSU Road Transport Corporation, Patiala Through its Managing Director & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
S.K. Sharma & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 4703 of 2009
Decided On : 08-08-2016

IMPORTANT POINT
When services of employees of a government department is transferred to a corporation lock, stock and barrel and there is no challenge to the same, the employees cease to be government servants.

Headnote:(a) Service law – Pension – Respondents claiming to have become servants of Punjab Government by virtue of States Reorganization Act – Act taking effect from 01.11.1956 – Services of respondents transferred to Corporation wef 16.10.1956 – Respondents becoming employees of the Corporation before merger of the PEPSU state into Punjab State – Cannot claim status of government servant and parity in pension with government servants. (Para 13)

       (2011) 11 SCC 702 – Referred

       AIR 1954 SC 217; AIR 1954 SC 217; (2007) 8 SCC 108; (1996) 10 SCC 172; (1996) 3 SCC 325; 1973(1) SLR 1080; (2014) 5 SCC 189; (2014) 4 SCC 144; (1997) 10 SCC 700 – Distinguished

       (b) Service law – Transfer of service – Absorption – Option – Respondents temporary employee of PEPSU State Roadways – Services transferred to PEPSU Road Transport Corporation en block – Respondents not challenging the order – Absorption complete on 16.10.1956 – No occasion for Corporation to seek option of employees. (Para 14)

       (c) Service law – Pension – Acquiescence – Delay and laches – Services of respondents transferred lock, stock and barrel to Corporation way back in 1956 – original PEPSU State also merging into Punjab State – Respondents acquiescing and not challenging the same – Getting promotions and retiring as per prevailing rules – Challenging the merger and claiming to remain government servants to claim pension after half a century – Not tenable. (Para 16, 17, 18)

       (1969) 1 SCC 466 – Relied upon

       Facts of the case:

       The respondents were appointed originally in PEPSU Roadways, between January 1955 and September 1956 on temporary basis. PEPSU Roadways was merged with PEPSU Road Transport Corporation wef 16.10.1956, so the services of all the temporary employees stood transferred to the Corporation with effect from 16.10.1956 on the prevailing terms and conditions till the approval of new terms and conditions by the Corporation. The respondents never challenged this declaration, got promotions etc. and continued to serve the Corporation till they all retired between 1989 and 1991.

       PEPSU Road Transport Corporation Regulations provided for Contributory Provident Fund (CPF). There was no provision for grant of pension.

       Much after the retirement of the respondents, only with effect from 15.06.1992 the Corporation framed PRTC Employees Pension/Gratuity and General Provident Fund Regulations, 1992 introducing pension.

       The respondents who had already received their retiral benefits under the 1957 Regulations filed the writ petition at hand claiming that they continued to be employees of the State in the department of PEPSU Roadways till PEPSU State was reorganized and from 01.11.1956, the date of reorganization they became employees of State of Punjab with right to pension as available to Government servants.

       The Single Judge allowed the writ petition on the premise that the respondents had simply been transferred from the parent department to serve in the Corporation and therefore they continued to be Government servants because there was no order passed for their absorption in the Corporation. The Letters Patent Appeal preferred by the appellants was dismissed.

       Finding of the Court:

       High Court wrongly allowed the writ petition and the second appeals.

       Result: Appeal allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Shiva Kirti Singh, J.

1. This appeal by special leave assails the judgment and order dated 24.04.2006 passed by a Division Bench of High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing LPA No. 700 of 2002 preferred by the appellants and affirming the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 11.01.2002 whereby Writ Petition bearing CWP No. 11908 of 1992 preferred by some of the respondents was allowed. Some had preferred to file suits and Civil Appeals which were dismissed. Their Regular Second Appeal No. 430 of 1995 was tagged with the above writ petition and was allowed by the same common judgment enabling all the 21 respondents to refund a part of CPF (Govt. Contribution) or agree for adjustment, to obtain pensionary benefits.

2. The respondents filed the writ petition in 1992 claiming that they were appointed originally in a department of PEPSU described as PEPSU Roadways, between January 1955 and September 1956. It is not in dispute that in the PEPSU Roadways the respondents’ appointment was only on temporary basis. PEPSU Roadways lost its utility due to creation of PEPSU Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Corporation’). Copy of notification dated 07.01.1956 available on record shows that Corporation was created by this notification under the provisions of the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 enforced with effect from 10.08.1954. The State Government through the Chief Secretary issued a letter dated 16.10.1956 informing the General Manager, PEPSU Roadways, Patiala (with reference to PEPSU Roadways’ communication dated 14.10.1956) that His Highness the Rajpramukh had ordered the transfer of PEPSU Roadways to the PEPSU Road Transport Corporation (with effect from 15.10.1956 forenoon) on various terms and conditions in respect to evaluation of the assets of the PEPSU Roadways as well as sharing the burden for payment of the employees of the Corporation. The letter indicates that the Corporation was requested to draw up the agreement required by clause (h) of sub-section (2) of Section 19 of the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 and forward the same to the Government for approval and signatures. On account of the States Reorganization Act the merger of State of PEPSU with the State of Punjab became effective from 01.11.1956. Through an Order no. 61 dated 30.11.1956 the Corporation admitted that PEPSU Roadways stood taken over by the Corporation from 16.10.1956 (before noon), so the services of all the temporary employees stood transferred to the Corporation with effect from 16.10.1956 on the prevailing terms and conditions till the approval of new terms and conditions by the Corporation. The respondents never challenged this declaration, got promotions etc. and continued to serve the Corporation till they all retired between 1989 and 1991. It is not in dispute that PEPSU Road Transport Corporation Regulations which was framed in 1957 provided for Contributory Provident Fund (CPF). There was no provision for grant of pension. Much after the retirement of the respondents, only with effect from 15.06.1992 the Corporation framed PRTC Employees Pension/Gratuity and General Provident Fund Regulations, 1992 (hereinafter described as ‘Regulations of 1992’). Under these Regulations, for the first time pension was introduced in the Corporation.

3. Soon after the enforcement of Regulations of 1992 the respondents who had already received their retiral benefits under the 1957 Regulations filed the writ petition at hand. Originally the grievance of the respondents in the writ petition was as to why the Regulations of 1992 have not been made retrospective but through an amendment in 1998, the writ petition was substantially amended so as to claim that they continued to be employees of the State in the department of PEPSU Roadways till PEPSU State was reorganized and from 01.11.1956, the date of reorganization they became employees of State of Punjab with right to pension as available to Government servants. The S























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top