RANJAN GOGOI, PRAFULLA C.PANT, A.M.KHANWILKAR
B. A. Umesh – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prafulla C. Pant, J.
Review Petition (Criminal) Nos. 135-136 of 2011 are heard in open court, as prayed in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Nos. 4213-4214 of 2016, in the light of decision of this Court in Mohd. Arif and others v. The Registrar, Supreme Court of India and others (2014) 9 SCC 737. The Review Petitions were earlier dismissed by circulation vide order dated 07.09.2011 affirming the dismissal of Criminal Appeal Nos. 285-286 of 2011, whereby death sentence awarded to the review petitioner, stood affirmed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that Jayashri (deceased), after death of her husband, used to live with her son PW-2 Suresh, aged seven years, in Bhuvaneshwarinagar, Bangalore, as a tenant of PW-8 Lalitha Jaya. On 28.02.1998 as usual the deceased brought back her son at 1.00 p.m. from the school. After lunch at home, the son went out to play with his friends. When PW-2 Suresh returned home at about 5.00 p.m., he noticed that petitioner B.A. Umesh going out through hall and told him that he was “uncle Venkatesh”. He (petitioner) further told him that his mothe
Mohd. Arif v. The Registrar, Supreme Court of India
B.A. Umesh v. Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka)
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab
Tarlok Singh v. State of Punjab
Aftab Ahmad Khan v. State of Hyderabad
Suthendraraja alias Suthenthira Raja alias Santhan v. State through DSP/CBI, SIT, Chennai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.