A.K.SIKRI, N.V.RAMANA
Ram Naresh Rawat – Appellant
Versus
Ashwini Ray – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Sikri, J.
All the petitioners who have filed these contempt petitions were engaged by the State of Madhya Pradesh on different dates on different posts but all of them were engaged as daily wagers. They continued as daily wagers for long spell of time. According to the petitioners, in terms of Madhya Pradesh Industrial Environment (Standing Order) Rules, 1963, they became entitled to be classified as 'permanent employees'. However, their demand for classification as permanent employees was not acceded to by the State, which inaction of the State Government provoked some of these employees to raise the industrial dispute for their classification which resulted into awards of the labour court directing their classification as 'permanent'. The labour court also held that on their classification as permanent, they would be entitled to the pay-scale of permanent post from dates specified in the award. Appeals were filed by the State against those orders which were dismissed by the industrial court and writ petitions also came to be dismissed by the High Court. This
State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi
case of Mahendra L. Jain & Ors. v. Indore Development Authority & Ors.
M.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd. & Anr. v. S.C. Pandey
State of M.P. & Ors. v. Lalit Kumar Verma
Indian Council of Agricultural Research & Anr. v. T.K. Suryanarayan & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.