SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1453

N.S.HEGDE, S.B.SINHA
Mahendra L. Jain – Appellant
Versus
Indore Development Authority – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.-These appeals arising out of a judgment and order dated 26.4.2000 passed in Writ Petition No. 1188 of 1997 by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench, involving similar questions of law and fact were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

BACKGROUND FACTS :

The Appellant Nos. 1 and 2 are Degree holders in Civil Engineering and Appellant Nos. 3 and 4 are Diploma holders in Civil Engineering. They having come to learn that certain vacancies exist in the Respondent-Authority, applied therefor although no advertisement in that behalf was issued. The Respondent-Authority appointed the Appellants and posted them to an overseas project known as Indore Habitat Project which was implemented through the agency of Overseas Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the ODA ), on daily wages @ Rs. 63/- per day for the Degree holders and Rs. 52.50 per day for the Diploma holders. On or about 17.3.1997, however, they began receiving a salary of Rs. 1500/- per month. Allegedly, from their salary, provident fund was being deducted. They were also being granted the benefit of leave.

2. A dispute arose as to whether all




















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top