ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT
B. K. PAVITRA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
These appeals involve the question of validity of the Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of Reservation (To the Posts in the Civil Services of the State) Act, 2002 (the impugned Act). The Act inter alia provides for grant of consequential seniority to the Government servants belonging to Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes promoted under reservation policy. It also protects consequential seniority already accorded from 27th April, 1978 onwards.
2. The validity of the Act was challenged before this Court by way of Writ Petition (Civil) No.61 of 2002 titled M. Nagaraj and others v. Union of India and others. The issue referred to larger Bench in the writ petition along with connected matters was decided by this Court on 19th October, 2006 [(2006) 8 SCC 212]. While upholding the constitutional validity of the Constitution (seventy-seventh Amendment) Act, 1995; the Constitution (Eighty-first Amendment) Act, 2000; the Constitution (Eighty-Second Amendment) Act, 2000 and the Constitution (Eighty-f
M.G. Badappanavar v. State of Karnataka
Ajit Singh Januja v. State of Punjab (Ajit Singh I)
Ajit Singh (II) v. State of Punjab
R.K. Sabharwal v. State of Punjab
Bhakta Ramegowda v. State of Karnataka
Union of India v. Virpal Chauhan
Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited v. Rajesh Kumar
Bimlesh Tanwar v. State of Haryana
Suraj Bhan Meena v. State of Rajasthan
Central Bank of India v. SC/ST Employees Welfare Association
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.