SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 197

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HINDU FRONT FOR JUSTICE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Vishnu Shankar, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, Adv.

ORDER

Delay condoned.

No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.

The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

* 2016 (1) ADJ 302 : Supreme 2015 All 1472

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top