SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ.
Pranay Kumar Podder – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura and Others – Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4393 OF 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.27388 of 2015) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.4394 OF 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.30772 of 2015)
Decided On : 23-03-2017
(2002) 101 DLT 471; RLW 2003 (4) Raj 2284; (2009) 14 SCC 546; (2004) 6 SCC 708; (2003) 4 SCC 524; (2014) 14 SCC 383 – Referred
Facts of the case:
The appellants appeared in the examination for admission to MBBS course and obtained the requisite marks to be selected.
The two students were declared to be ineligible to take admission to MBBS course at the stage of counselling on the score that they suffered partial colour blindness.
The appellants approached the High Court seeking relief that the declaration of ineligibility by the concerned Committee was absolutely indefensible and legally impermissive.
The Division Bench of the High Court expressed the view that the guidelines issued by the Medical Council of India deserves to be given its due weightage by the Court and it should not interfere solely on the ground that the Regulations are silent with regard to the denial of admission to an individual suffering from colour blindness. Being of this view, it dismissed the writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
Persons with CVD may not be incapable of practicing in many fields of medical science.
Result: Directions given, committee of experts constituted and case adjourned to 11. 7.2017.
JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, J.
Leave granted.
2. The appellants, after crossing two scores and one, nurtured the ambition, which is quite a usual feature to human nature unless the innate nature is distracted by some kind of aberration, to prosecute medical education and for the said purpose they appeared in the examination and obtained the requisite marks to be selected. At that stage, the old saying "the proposals conceived in mind are not always concretized" or the beginning does not achieve the end or for many a reason, as it appears, took the principal seat and the two students were declared to be ineligible to take admission to MBBS course at the stage of counselling held on 23rd June, 2015 on the score that they suffered partial colour blindness. In such a situation, the appellants being determined and affirmatively obstinate not to abandon their pursuit, approached the High Court of Tripura at Agartala in W.P.(C) Nos.244 and 252 of 2015 seeking relief that the declaration of ineligibility by the concerned Committee was absolutely indefensible and legally impermissive. The submission of the appellants was built on the foundation that there were no regulations framed by the Medical Council of India under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, debarring the likes from admission, for in the absence of a regulation, neither any instruction nor resolution of the MCI could throttle the right to appear.
3. The stand and stance put forth by the appellants was resisted by the State placing reliance on the recommendations of the expert Committee of the Medical Council of India. The said recommendations are as follows:-
"The expert committee deliberated at length about the importance of normal colour vision to pursue various subjects in the curriculum of MBBS course. All the experts unanimously thought that the presence of normal colour vision was indispensable to acquire the desired competency of a MBBS doctor. The presence of good colour vision is also essential to pursue post graduation in various disciplines of Medicine and Surgery. Moreover, as the normal colour vision is essential all the services mentioned under the category 'Technical' which included Indian Police Service, Indian Forest Service, Railway Engineering Service, Indian Railway Traffic Service, Posts on Marine establishment, Telegraph Engineering Services etc., it is imperative that the doctor who conducts the medical exam of these individuals should also have normal colour vision. The main recommendations of the Committee were as follows:-
The testing of colour vision must be conducted in respect of all the students for admission to MBBS course. The colour defective students should not be allowed to pursue the MBBS course as a normal colour vision is absolutely necessary for such a study."
4. Apart from that, reliance was also placed on the recommendations dated 12th October, 2004 of the General Body Meeting. The said recommendations which are relevant are extracted hereunder:-
"1. Admission of visually handicapped persons for MBBS:
It is mandatory that the students who are selected to join MBBS course should undergo an eye examination by a qualified Ophthalmologist and must be certified to have best corrected visual activity of 6/9 in each eye. In case of one-eyed person, the best corrected visual activity should be 6/6. The candidate should be able to identify the three primary colours.
2. The time of onset blindness and continuation of their curriculum from thereon:
Retention of normal vision is an absolute need for undergoing the training in medical curriculum unlike in other streams of education like Arts and Science. Medicine is a course where perfect vision is the absolute need. The Committee recommends that a candidate who becomes visually challenged after having been admitted to the course and completed to a reasonable extent his clinical training may still be considered fit for assessment and final examination. However, if the candidate develops visual challenge befor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.