ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Nabha Power Limited (NPL) – Appellant
Versus
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. -
Facts:
The Punjab State Electricity Board ('PSEB') in the year 2009 conducted an international competitive bidding for selection of developer through tariff based bidding process for procurement of power on long term basis from a power station to be set up at Village Nalash, Rajpura, District Patiala, Punjab. This power station was envisaged as a Case-2 bid project (Case-2, Scenario-4) criteria by PSEB in terms of the competitive bidding guidelines issued by the Government of India as per Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the 'EA').
2. The significance of the aforesaid is that Part-7 of the EA, which contains the provisions for tariff, provides for tariff regulations to be determined by the appropriate commission as per guiding principles set out in the Section of the EA. The tariff is determined under Section 62 of the EA. However in a scenario such as the present case, the determination is as per the provisions of Section 63 of the EA, which reads as under:
"Section 63. Determination of tariff by bidding process.
Liverpool City Council v. Irwin, [H.L. (E.)]
Shell U.K. Ltd. v. Lostock Garage Ltd.
Attorney General of Belize v. Belize Telecom Ltd.
M/s. Dhanrajamal Gobindram v. M/s. Shamji Kalidas and Co.
The Union of India v. M/s. D.N. Revri & Co.
Satya Jain (Dead) Through LRs. v. Anis Ahmed Rushdie (Dead) Through LRs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.