SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1094

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.
The Citizen Co-Operative Society Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Hyderabad - Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-9 (1), Hyderabad - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 10245 of 2017 (Arising Out of SLP (C) No. 20044 of 2015)
Decided On : 08-08-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K. Shivraj Choudhuri
For the Respondent: Ms. Anil Katiyar

The judgment established that co-operative societies must adhere to the provisions of the relevant co-operative society acts and maintain the principle of mutuality to claim the benefit under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Headnote:

Section 80P - Income Tax - Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 80P

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, a co-operative society, sought the benefit of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer denied the deduction, stating that it is only admissible to co-operative societies engaged in banking or providing credit facilities to its members. The appellant was carrying on banking business for the public at large and outsiders, and was denied the benefit under Section 80P(4) of the Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant's activities violated the provisions of the Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies Act, 1995, and the principle of mutuality was missing. The court upheld the decision of the lower authorities, denying the appellant the benefit of Section 80P of the Act.

Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite carrying on banking business for the public at large and outsiders.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appellant's activities violated the provisions of the Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies Act, 1995, and the principle of mutuality was missing, thereby disentitling the appellant from claiming the benefit under Section 80P of the Act.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was denied the benefit of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Sikri, J.

Leave granted.

2. The appellant herein, after losing in all the fora below, has knocked the doors of this Court by means of the present appeal seeking the benefit of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). The Assessing Officer held that deduction in respect of income of co-operative societies under Section 80P of the Act is not admissible to the appellant as the benefit of deduction, as contemplated under the said provision is, inter alia, admissible to those co-operative societies which carry on business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members. On the contrary, the appellant society was carrying on the banking business for public at large and for all practical purposes it was acting like a co-operative bank governed by the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and its operation was not confined to its members but outsiders as well.

3. It may be noted at this stage itself that Section 80P of the Act provides for certain deduction in respect of incomes of the co-operative societies. A co-operative society is defined by Section 2(19) of the Act. Where the gross total income of such co-operative societies includes any income referred to in sub-section (2) of Section 80P, the sums specified in sub-section (2) are allowed as deduction in accordance with and subject to the provisions of the said Section, while computing the total income of the assessee. The profit exempted is the net profit included in the total income and not the gross profit of the business. Sub-section (2) enlists those sums which are allowed as deductions. Clause (a) of sub-section (2) includes seven kinds of co-operative societies which are entitled to this benefit, and in respect of the co-operative societies engaged in the activities mentioned in those seven classes, the whole of the amount of profits and gains of business attributable to anyone or more of such activities is exempted from income by allowing the said income as deduction. We are concerned with sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (2) of Section 80P which enlists a co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members. For the sake of better understanding, we reproduce below the aforesaid portion of Section 80P:

80P. Deduction in respect of income of co-operative societies.–

(1) Where, in the case of an assesee being a co-operative society, the gross total income includes any income referred to in sub-section (2), there shall be deducted, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, the sums specified in sub-section (2), in computing the total income of the assessee.

(2) The sums referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely:-

(a) in the case of a co-operative society engaged in -

(i) carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members, or

xx xx xx

the whole of the amount of profits and gains of business attributable to any one or more of such activities:

xx xx xx”

4. Section 80P was amended by the Finance Act, 2006 with effect from April 01, 2007 and sub-section (4) was inserted thereto. This sub-section (4) reads as under:

“(4) The provisions of this section shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank.

Explanation.– For the purposes of this sub-section,-

(a) “co-operative bank” and “primary agricultural credit society” shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949);

(b) “primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank” means a society having its area of operation confined to a taluk and the principal object of which is to provide for long-term credit for agricultural and rural development activities.



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top