N.V.RAMANA, AMITAVA ROY
KUNA @ SANJAYA BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
AMITAVA ROY, J.
The appellant, successively convicted by both the courts below along with one Pravati Behera under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for Short, hereinafter to be referred to as “IPC/Code”) along with Section 34 of the Code is in appeal seeking remedial intervention.
2. Whereas the Trial Court by the judgment and order dated 26.1.2001, as stated hereinbefore, convicted the appellant and the co-accused Pravati Behera, the High Court by the verdict impugned, though has affirmed the conviction of both, had left the co-accused at liberty to move an application for premature release from the jail and for appropriate orders under Sections 433 and 433-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, hereinafter to be referred to as “Cr.P.C.”). Noticeably, the appellant and co-accused had been charged along with Section 302 IPC for the offence under Section 203 as well but were acquitted thereof by the Trial Court. Though an appeal was preferred by the State against such acquittal, the High Court has affirmed their exoneration as well.
3. We have heard Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, learned senior counsel for the appellant and Mr. Shibashish Misra for the resp
Anil Phukhan v. State of Assam
Ramji Surya Padvi v. State of Maharashtra
Chuhar Singh v. State of Haryana
State of A.P. v. Patnam Anandam
Mahamadkhan Nathekhan v. State of Gujarat
Budha Satya Venkata S. Rao v. State of A.P.
Niranjan Panja v. State of West Bengal
Nagraj v. State represented by Inspector of Police, Salem Town, Tamil Nadu
Lokeman Shah v. State of West Bengal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.