ORDER :

Leave granted.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Appellant’s Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) No.2679 of 2005, decided on 13.5.2010, Appellant is before us challenging the same on variety of grounds.

3. The Appellant preferred the LPA against the judgment and order passed by learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi in Respondent’s Writ Petition (C) No.2962 of 2001 decided on 23.8.2005, whereby and whereunder Resopndent/employee of the Appellant has been held to be entitled for pensionary benefits.

4. The Respondent, an erstwhile employee of Appellant, claimed pensionary benefits to be granted to him under the provisions of Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 (hereinafter shall be referred to as ‘Pension Rules’).

5. Learned Single Judge, after considering the Respondent’s Writ Petition, came to the conclusion that he would be entitled to receive the pension in accordance with Pension Rules and all arrears of pension from the date of filing the Writ Petition should be paid to him. This order was subject matter of challenge before the Division Bench of the High Court by fil