ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, NAVIN SINHA
Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co-Operative Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bhadra Products – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.F. Nariman, J.
Leave granted.
2. An interesting question arises as to whether an award delivered by an Arbitrator, which decides the issue of limitation, can be said to be an interim award, and whether such interim award can then be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The brief facts necessary to dispose of the present appeal are as follows.
3. The appellant before us issued a tender enquiry to 19 parties, including the respondent, for supply of Defoamers. The respondent submitted its bid, pursuant to which a Letter of Intent dated 2nd November, 2006 was issued to the respondent for supply of 800 Metric Tonnes of Defoamers to be used for production of 3,08,880 Metric Tonnes of P2O5. By 11th April, 2007, the respondent had supplied 800 Metric Tonnes of Defoamers, however, they could not achieve the targeted production by the end of 1st November, 2007, which was the validity of the supply period. After considerable delay, on 6th June, 2011, the respondent issued a legal notice demanding payment of Rs. 6,35,74,245/- on 27th September, 2012. The appellant made it clear that there was nothing due and pay
National Thermal Power Corpn. Ltd. v. Siemens Atkeingesellschaft
Satwant Singh Sodhi v. State of Punjab
McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd.
Official Trustee v. Sachindra Nath Chatterjee
Ittavira Mathai v. Varkey Varkey
Pandurang Dhoni Chougule v. Maruti Hari Jadhav (1966) 1 SCR 102 – Referred [Para 24]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.