SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 334

DIPAK MISRA, A. M. KHANWILKAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Law and Order) Revenue Department – Appellant
Versus
Kamala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dr D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

1. The High Court has set aside an order of detention issued under Section 3(1)(ii) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act 1974 [The COFEPOSA Act 1974] on the ground that the period of detention was not specified. In arriving at this conclusion, the High Court has relied upon a decision of this Court in Commissioner of Police v Gurbux Anandram Bhiryani [1988 (Supp) SCC 568], and on a judgment of the High Court in S Santhi v The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai [3 2010 (3) MWN (Cr.) 42 (DB) ].

2. The Government of Tamil Nadu is in appeal.

3. The submission which has been urged is that though the period of detention has come to an end, it is necessary for the Court to correct the statement of legal position contained in the decision of the High Court. Learned counsel has drawn the attention of the Court to the fact that the earlier decision of a Bench of two judges in Bhiryani (supra) was overruled by a Bench of three judges in T Devaki v Government of Tamil Nadu, (1990) 2 SCC 456.

4. In T Devaki v Government of Tamil Nadu, a Bench of this Court has held





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top