MADAN B.LOKUR, DEEPAK GUPTA
Telangana Housing Board – Appellant
Versus
Azamunnisa Begum (Died) Thru. Lrs. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Madan B. Lokur, J.
Leave granted.
1. The question for our consideration relates to the interpretation of Section 87 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli and the meaning of the expression ‘clerical error’. The further question is whether a ‘clerical error’ can be corrected “at any time” or only within a reasonable time.
2. In our opinion, the correction sought to be made by the respondents is not a ‘clerical error’ and so the further question really does not arise. However, the expression “at any time’ cannot be interpreted to stretch over a period of 25 years, as in the present case.
Land Acquisition Proceedings
3. On 24th May, 1963 a notification was issued under the provisions of Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Land Acquisition Act). The entire acquisition was of a few thousand acres comprising of dozens of survey numbers. Amongst others, the acquisition included survey nos. 1009, 1043 to 1065 comprising of 1110.07 acres in Kukatpally Village, Balanagar Mandal in Ranga Reddy District of Andhra Pradesh. The entire acquis
M/s Tata Consulting Engineers v. Workmen
Master Construction Co. (P) Ltd. v. State of Orissa
Vipinchandra Vadilal Bavishi (Dead) by Lrs. v. State of Gujarat
K.P. Varghese v. Income Tax Officer, Ernakulum
Desh Bandhu Gupta and Co. v. Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.