ARUN MISHRA, S.ABDUL NAZEER
RAJDEEP GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT
ARUN MISHRA, J.
1. The writ petitions have been preferred under Article 32 of the Constitution of India questioning the constitutional validity of Rule3(1)(c) of the Medical Colleges and Dental Colleges of Assam (Regulations of Admission into 1st year MBBS/BDS Courses) Rules, 2017 (in short referred to as ‘the Rules of 2017’). The petitioners have come with the case that though State can provide for preference in the matter of admission, however, such classification must be based upon objective criteria and must have a rational nexus with the objective it seeks to achieve.
2. Rule 3 of the Rules of 2017 provides for eligibility for the State quota seats. Same is extracted hereunder :
“Rule 3 – Eligibility for State Quota Seats:
The following conditions must be fulfilled:
1.(a) The candidate must be a citizen of India.
(b) The candidate must be a permanent citizen of Assam. The father/ mother or the candidate must be residing in the State of Assam continuously for not less than a period of 20 years. (The certificate at Annexure – I in Application Form at Schedule – I of these rules must be submitted if a candidate is called for counseling): Provided that this shall not be app
Dr. Jagadish Saran v. Union of India
D.P. Joshi v. State of Madhya Bharat
Kumari N. Vasundara v. State of Mysore
Dr. Pradeep Jain. v. Union of India
Anant Madaan v. State of Haryana
Dr. Jagadish Saran v. Union of India
Saurabh Chaudri v. Union of India
Nikhil Himthani v. State of Uttarakhand
Vishal Goyal v. State of Karnataka
Magan Mehrotra v. Union of India
Dr. Kriti Lakhina v. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.