SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1181

RANJAN GOGOI, N.V.RAMANA
Relx India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Eastern Book Company – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ms. Pratibha Singh, Mr. Vikas Mehta, Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Ms. Priyanka Khimani
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajeev Dutta, Mr. Awanish Sinha, Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Mr. Satya P. Sharan, Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Mr. Harshavardhan, Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Mr. Dhananjay Bhaskar Roy, Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao

ORDER :

1. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties the appeal is disposed of with the following directions:

The appellants will be at liberty to publish, sell and distribute the raw judgments of the Supreme Court of India and other Courts obtained from whichever source along with their own head-notes, editorial notes, paraphrasing, explanatory notes, etc. as laid down in Eastern Book Company and others versus D.B. Modak and another [(2008) 1 SCC 1].

We further direct the learned trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same as expeditiously as possible.

2. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top