SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1537

V.GOPALA GOWDA, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
M. Suresh – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondents: S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, D. Mahesh Babu, Ms. Tatini Basu

ORDER :

These appeals have been preferred against the order dated 30th March, 2012 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Criminal Petition Nos. 7657 of 2009 and 7588 of 2010, whereby the High Court has declined to quash the proceedings initiated against the appellants by respondent No. 2 by filing a criminal complaint bearing CC No. 1736 of 2006 dated 26th June 2006 before the III Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. The appellants are named as accused Nos. 1 and 2 respectively.

2. The case set out in the complaint is that accused No. 2 (A 2) introduced accused No.1 (A 1) as owner of the land admeasuring 39 acres 19 guntas in the State of Karnataka. A-2 assured the complainant that A-1 was a genuine person and the complainant agreed to purchase the land in December, 2004 and paid Rs. 10 Lacs as advance. On 22nd January, 2005 a MOU was also entered into between the complainants and A-1. A-3 and A-4 were the witnesses. In all, a sum of Rs. 85 Lacs was paid by the complainant by way of demand drafts to A-1. The accused were to hand over the documents of the prop













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top