SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 1104

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R. BANUMATHI, INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ.
Kamil – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1568 of 2015
Decided On : 31-10-2018

IMPORTANT POINT
Sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error, omission or irregularity in the charge including any mis-joinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal, confirmation or revision unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby.

Headnote:Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 464 – Sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error, omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder – Cannot be held invalid by court of appeal, confirmation or revision – Unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby – Instantly, no charge was framed against appellant u/s 302/34 but two co-accused so charged for the same crime – Gist of charge sheet clearly alleging sharing of common intention of all four accused of murdering deceased – Trial court pointing out that accused were charged u/s 302, 302/34, 323 and 323/34 IPC to which they pleaded not guilty and opted for trial – Appellant not raising objection to his committal to sessions court – Also not raising the issue before High Court – Held no prejudice caused to appellant by non framing of charge u/s 302 – Hence no infirmity in conviction. (Para 18, 19, 21 23)

       AIR 1956 SC 116; AIR 1957 SC 623; (2010) 10 SCC 130; (2012) 10 SCC 476; (2011) 9 SCC 272 – Relied upon

       Facts of the case:

       The appellant along with three accused was convicted u/s 302 and 323 r/w 34 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment.

       The High Court affirmed the conviction and the sentence.

       Finding of the Court:

       Non framing of charge did not caused any prejudice to the appellant.

       Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

R. Banumathi, J.

This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 28.07.2014 passed by the High Court of Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.1047 of 1989 in and by which the High Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant thereby affirming his conviction under Section 302 IPC and for other offences and sentence of life imprisonment imposed upon him passed by the trial court.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 03.01.1986 at about 09.00 AM, complainant-Baboo Khan (PW-3) who is the maternal uncle of deceased Akhlaq was informed by his father that his sister’s daughter Parveen had gone to fetch water from the tank where accused Rashid (A1) and Adil (A3) had misbehaved with her. However, no further action was taken by them to save their reputation. On the same day, at around 04.00 PM, when complainant/PW-3 along with his nephew deceased Akhlaq and Aadil Hussain (PW-2) were going towards his shop, they saw accused Rashid armed with knife, Nasir (A2) armed with hockey, accused Adil and appellant-Kamil (A4) armed with danda in their hands coming towards them and surrounded PW-1, deceased Akhlaq and PW-3. Thereafter, appellant-Kamil gave a danda blow on the head of PW-2 and when deceased Akhlaq tried to snatch the hockey stick from accused Nasir, appellant-Kamil also gave a danda blow on the head of deceased from behind and when he tried to run away, accused Nasir and Adil caught hold of deceased and thereafter accused Rashid stabbed the knife in the chest of deceased on which deceased fell down on the ground with the knife which was stabbed on his chest. On raising alarm by PW-3, Jamal Uddin (PW-1) along with other people came there for help. Thereafter, all the accused ran away and deceased was taken to the hospital, where he died. Upon completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the accused persons.

3. Charges were framed against the accused under Sections 302, 302 read with Section 34, 323 and 323 read with Section 34 IPC. To bring home the guilt of the accused, the prosecution examined eight witnesses and exhibited number of documents.

4. Upon consideration of evidence adduced, the trial court vide its judgment dated 01.05.1989 convicted the accused as under:-

Accused

Conviction

Sentence

Rashid (A1)

Section 302 IPC

Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC

Life Imprisonment One month R.I.

Nasir (A2)

Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC

Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC

Life Imprisonment One month R.I.

Adil (A3)

Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC

Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC

Life Imprisonment One month R.I.

Kamil (A4)

Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC

Section 323 IPC

Life Imprisonment One month R.I.

5. Being aggrieved, the appellant/accused filed appeal before the High Court which came to be dismissed vide impugned judgment dated 28.07.2014. Further, appeal preferred by the accused Nasir before the Supreme Court in SLP(Crl) No.9886 of 2014 was dismissed vide order dated 22.01.2015.

6. Prosecution relies upon the evidence of eye-witness Babu/Baboo Khan (PW-3), Jamaluddin (PW-1) and Aadil (PW-2) who have categorically stated that on the date of incident i.e on 03.01.1986 at 04.00 PM, PW-3 along with his nephew deceased Akhlaq and Adil Hussain (PW-2) was going to his shop at Jogipura and when they reached near the temple at Lalpur, they saw all the four accused persons standing and waiting for them. PW-3 further deposed that at that time accused Rashid was having knife in his hand whereas accused Nasir and Kamil were having hockey and danda in their hands respectively. Immediately thereafter, appellant/accused Kamil gave a danda blow on the head of Adil Hussain (PW-2). When deceased Akhlaq tried to snatch hockey stick from accused Nasir, appellant/accused Kamil gave a danda blow on the head of deceased Akhlaq from behind. When deceased Akhlaq tried





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top