SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 1126

RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, N.V.RAMANA
H. Pukhraj – Appellant
Versus
D. Parasmal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Vipul Jai, Vipin Kumar Jai.
For the Respondents: Nanita Sharma, Vivek Sharma.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted. The Appellant is the complainant. The Respondent is the accused. For the disposal of this case, it is not necessary to give details of the facts of the case. Suffice it to say that a cheque in the sum of Rs. 6,19,488/- (Rupees six lakh nineteen thousand four hundred and eighty eight only) was issued by the Respondent to the Appellant. The cheque is dated 11.04.2003. When it was presented for encashment on the same day, it bounced. The Appellant filed complaint on 27.05.2003. The trial was conducted by the Judicial Magistrate No. V, Coimbatore. Learned Magistrate by order dated 05.09.2005 convicted the Respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ("the NI Act") and sentenced him to undergo six months imprisonment and also to pay fine of Rs. 4,000/- in default, to undergo three months further imprisonment. Being aggrieved by this judgment, the Respondent preferred an appeal in the Court of Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No. 1, Coimbatore. The learned Additional District Judge confirmed the conviction. However, the Additional District Judge modified the order of sentence. He reduced the sentence to three weeks. Being aggrieved by









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top