SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 55

A.K.SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN, M.R.SHAH
Nagpur Improvement Trust – Appellant
Versus
Bombaywala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Mahul M. Gupta, Mr. R.P. Gupta, Mr. Y.P. Singh, Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Mr. Abhay Kumar, Mr. Prashant Pakhiddey, Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Mr. Himanshu Pal Singh, Mr. Vineet Kumar Singh, Ms. Shivi Shethi, Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.R, Ms. Sonali Malik, Ms. Liz Mathew, Mr. Kush Chaturvedi
For the Respondents: Mr. Vishal Prasad, Mr. Shriram P. Pingle, Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Mr. Nitin Bhardwaj, Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Mr. Aman Varma

JUDGMENT :

M.R. Shah, J.

Leave granted in all these Special Leave Petitions.

As common question of law and facts arise in this group of appeals arising out of the impugned judgment and order dated 15.09.2016 passed by the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Nagpur passed in Writ Petition No.2695 of 2015, all these appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. For the sake of convenience, Civil Appeal arising out of the SLP© No. 32089 of 2016 is treated as lead matter and the facts in the said appeal are narrated.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 15.09.2016 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur passed in W.P.No.2695 of 2015 by which the Division Bench has allowed the said Writ Petition preferred by the respondents Nos.1 to 18 herein-original petitioners Nos. 1 to 18 some of the occupants/tenants of the building in question and by which the Division Bench has set aside the notice dated 24.04.2015 issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust, the original respondents-Nagpur Improvement Trust and others have preferred the present appeals.

3. The facts leading to the present appeals


















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top