R.V.RAVEENDRAN, H.L.GOKHALE
Girish Vyas – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
H.L. Gokhale J.
What is the nature and significance of the planning process for a large Municipal town area? In that process, what is the role of the Municipal Corporation, which is the statutory planning authority? Can the State Government interfere in its decisions in that behalf and if so, to what extent? Does the State Government have the power to issue instructions to the Municipal Corporation to act in a particular manner contrary to the Development Plan sanctioned by the State Government, and that too a number of years after the Municipal Corporation having taken the necessary steps in consonance with the plan? Can the State Government instruct a Municipal Corporation to shift the reservation for a public amenity such as a primary school on a plot of land, and also instruct it to grant a development permission for residential purposes thereon without modifying the Development Plan? Could it still be considered as an action following the due process of law merely because a provision of Development Control Rules is relied upon, whether it is applicable or not? Or where the Municipal Corporation is required to take such contrary steps, supposedly on the instructions o
Reserve Bank of India Vs. Peerless Corpn. reported in [AIR 1987 SC 1023 = 1987 (1) SCC 424]
Bangalore Medical Trust Vs. B.S. Muddapa reported in [1991 (4) SCC 54]
Raju S. Jethmalani Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in [2005 (11) SCC 222]
Laxmi Narayan Bhattad Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in [2003 (5) SCC 413]
PR Naidu v. Government of Andhra Pradesh (reported in AIR 1977 SC 854) = [1977 (3) SCC 160]
VL and Co. v. Bennett Coloman and Co. [AIR 1977 SCC 1884] = [1977 (1) SCC 561]
Mohinder Singh Gill Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi reported in 1978 (1) SCC 405
Special Land Acquisition Bombay Vs. M/s Godrej & Boyce reported in AIR 1987 SC 2421
Girnar Traders (3) Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. reported in 2011 (3) SCC 1
Ghulam Mustafa Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 1976 (1) SCC 800
Mangal Oram Vs. State of Orissa reported in 1977 (2) SCC 46
State of Maharashtra Vs. Mahadeo Deoman Rai reported in 1990 (3) SCC 579
Collector of 24 Parganas Vs. Lalit Mohan Mullick reported in 1986 (2) SCC 138
Union of India Vs. Jaswant Rai Kochhar reported in 1996 (3) SCC 491
State of Maharashtra Vs. Mahadeo Deoman Rai reported in 1990 (3) SCC 579
State of Bihar Vs. Dhirendra Kumar & Ors. reported in 1995 (4) SCC 229
Pratibha Cooperative Housing Society Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 1991 (3) SCC 341
M.I Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Radhey Shyam Sahu & Ors. reported in 1999 (6) SCC 464
Tarlochan Das Vs. State of Punjab & Ors reported in 2001 (6) SCC 260
E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu [AIR 1974 SC 555]
Shivajirao Nilangekar Patil v. Dr. Mahesh Madhav Gosavi [1987 (1) SCC 227]
State of U.P. Vs. Mohammad Naim [AIR 1964 SC 703]
Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India [AIR 1984 SC802]
P.K. Dave Vs. Peoples’ Union of Civil Liberties (Delhi) & Ors. reported in 1996 (4) SCC 262
Jasbir Singh Chhabra Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2010 (4) SCC 192
Common Cause, A Registered Society Vs. Union of India & Ors. reported in 1999 (6) SCC 667
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.