UDAY UMESH LALIT, D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Hukam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
ORDER :
UDAY UMESH LALIT, J.
1. After the judgment dated 11.01.2019 was passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 264-270 of 2019 (Wazir and Another vs. State of Haryana) and in all other connected matters (hereinafter referred to as the "Judgment"), these applications for recall of the Judgment have been filed on following grounds:-
(a) The tabular chart extracted in paragraph 11 of the Judgment was not correct and there were mistakes pertaining to various sale deeds mentioned therein namely:
(i) With regard to Ex. P1 the correct sale consideration was Rs. 4,00,000/- and thus the value per acre in respect of sale of said Ex. P1 sale deed would be Rs. 16,00,000/-.
(ii) In respect of sale deed Ex. P2 the sale consideration was Rs. 3,00,000/- and the value per acre would be Rs. 16,00,000/-.
(iii) In respect of sale deed Ex.P4 the village was wrongly mentioned to be Kasan instead of village Bas Kusla.
(b) Paragraph 20 of the Judgment extracted certain portions of the decision in Surender Singh vs. State of Haryana and others, (2018) 3 SCC 278 and para 27 of the decision in Surender Singh had wrongly mentioned annual increase of 8%, whereas, the High Court had actually granted annual increase
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.