SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HEMANT GUPTA
MAHENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
1. The Criminal Appeal No. 1266 of 2010 preferred by Mahendran (Accused No. 3), and Criminal Appeal No. 1260 of 2010 preferred by Ravi (Accused No. 1), Singaravelu (Accused No. 2), Iyappan (Accused No. 4), Rajendran (Accused No. 5), Selvaraj (Accused No. 6), Karunakaran (Accused No. 7), Arunachalam (Accused No. 8) and Sundaramoorthy (Accused No. 9) arise out of a common judgment by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on 26.09.2008. The High Court has acquitted Mohan (Accused No. 10), Ravi (Accused No. 12), P. Mohan (Accused No. 13), Palanivel Thevar (Accused No. 14) and Kannan (Accused No. 15) from all charges by granting them benefit of doubt. The accused are referred to with reference to their status before the trial court.
2. The prosecution had put on trial twenty-four persons for various offences, but the learned trial court found the charges proved only against Accused Nos. 1-10 and 12-15 and sentenced to imprisonment as per the order passed in respect of the offences proved against them, whereas, Manivasagam (Accused No.11), Ganapathy (Accused No. 16) Muruganandam (Accused No. 17), Saravanan (Accused No. 18), Kathiah (Accused No. 19), Maiyilai
Balaka Singh v. State of Punjab
Gangadhar Behera and Others Vs. State of Orissa
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Punjab
Joseph vs. State, Represented by Inspector of Police
Krishna Mochi v. State of Bihar
Najabhai Desurbhai Wagh vs. Valerabhai Deganbhai Vagh and Others.
Noushad alias Noushad Pasha and Others vs. State of Karnataka
Padma Sundara Rao vs. State of T.N.
Ram Laxman vs. State of Rajasthan
Sanjeev Kumar Gupta vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
State of Punjab v. Jagir Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.