ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, VINEET SARAN
Icomm Tele Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Punjab State Water Supply And Sewerage Board – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.F. Nariman. J.
Leave granted.
2. In 2008, the Punjab State Water Supply & Sewerage Board, Bhatinda issued notice inviting tender for extension and augmentation of water supply, sewerage scheme, pumping station and sewerage treatment plant for various towns mentioned therein on a turnkey basis. On 25.9.2008, the appellant company, which is involved in civil/electrical works in India, was awarded the said tender after having been found to be the best suited for the task. On 16.1.2009, a formal contract was entered into between the appellant and respondent No. 2. It may be mentioned that the notice inviting tender formed part and parcel of the formal agreement. Contained in the notice inviting tender is a detailed arbitration clause. In this matter, we are concerned with clause 25(viii) which is set out as follows:-
"viii. It shall be an essential term of this contract that in order to avoid frivolous claims the party invoking arbitration shall specify the dispute based on facts and calculations stating the amount claimed under each claim and shall furnish a "deposit-at-cal
Central Inland Water Transport Corpn. v. Brojo Nath Ganguly
Directorate of Education v. Educomp Datamatics Ltd.
Global Energy Ltd. v. Adani Exports Ltd.
ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. of India Ltd.
A.L. Kalra v. The Project & Equipment Corporation of India Limited
Dnyandeo Sabaji Naik v. Pradnya Prakash Khadekar
General Motors (I) (P) Ltd. v. Ashok Ramnik Lal Tolat
State of J&K v. Dev Dutt Pandit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.